Abstract image indicating complaint intake

Complaints Procedure

Purpose: This complaints procedure sets out the formal process for receiving, assessing and resolving complaints and outlines the standards we apply when handling concerns. It explains what a complaint means, the principles for complaint handling, and the typical steps in a complaint handling process. The aim is to ensure complaints are managed in a consistent, fair and transparent manner to support continuous improvement.

Scope and Definitions

This complaints policy applies to any expression of dissatisfaction about services, behaviour, decisions or processes that individuals bring to the organisation. A complaint can be raised by anyone affected by our services or operations, including representatives acting on another’s behalf. The policy covers both informal concerns and formal complaints and distinguishes between a routine service query and a formal dispute requiring investigation.

Illustration of complaint submission process

How to lodge a complaint: Complaints may be submitted through available channels and should include enough information to allow assessment. Typical elements include:

  • A clear description of the issue or incident;
  • Where and when it occurred;
  • Who was involved, where known;
  • The outcome you seek.
Please provide relevant documents or evidence where possible. Submissions should be factual and respectful. Complaints that are frivolous or abusive may be managed differently to protect staff and resources.

Acknowledgement and Initial Assessment

Upon receipt, complaints are logged and acknowledged without undue delay. An initial assessment identifies whether the matter is suitable for investigation under this complaints handling procedure and determines appropriate next steps. The acknowledgement will usually explain the process, expected timeframes and who is responsible for managing the complaint. Reasonable timeframes are applied to allow for proper investigation while keeping the complainant informed.

Graphic representing investigation and review

Investigation and Evidence Gathering

An impartial investigator will gather relevant evidence, interview parties where appropriate and review documentation. Investigations follow these core principles: fairness, impartiality, proportionality and confidentiality. Investigative steps can include fact-finding interviews, review of records and consideration of applicable policies. All parties will be given an opportunity to present their account and any supporting information.

Decision and Outcome: After the investigation, a reasoned decision is prepared that addresses the facts, identifies any breaches of policy or standards, and sets out any corrective actions or remedies. Outcomes may include an explanation, apology, changes to practice, corrective measures or other remedies deemed appropriate. The decision will be communicated clearly and in writing to the complainant and others directly affected, where appropriate.

Escalation and Review

If a complainant is dissatisfied with the outcome, an internal escalation or review process is available. Escalation may involve senior management or an independent reviewer to ensure impartial re-evaluation. Reviews focus on whether the procedure was followed, whether the investigation was thorough and whether the remedy was proportionate. Escalation routes are documented so that requests for review are handled consistently.

Icon for escalation and internal review

Record Keeping and Confidentiality: Accurate records are kept for every complaint, including the original submission, investigation notes, correspondence and the final outcome. Records are retained in accordance with data retention practices and are accessible only to authorised personnel. Confidentiality is maintained throughout to protect personal information, with disclosure limited to what is necessary for the purposes of investigation and resolution.

Symbol for recordkeeping and confidentiality

Continuous Improvement and Publication of Learning: Complaints are a source of organisational learning. Aggregate data and anonymised trends are analysed periodically to identify systemic issues and inform improvements to policy, training and operations. Staff receive training on complaint handling best practices, and procedural changes are implemented where they can reduce recurrence. The complaints handling process is reviewed regularly to ensure it remains effective, proportionate and aligned with the organisation’s values.

Principles applied throughout this complaints handling process include accessibility, responsiveness, fairness and transparency. Where third parties are involved, the organisation will cooperate with relevant oversight mechanisms while respecting privacy and confidentiality obligations. This complaints framework is intended to provide a clear, consistent and reliable route for addressing concerns and achieving timely and appropriate resolutions.

Earls Court Cleaners

A clear, fair complaints procedure outlining scope, submission, assessment, investigation, outcomes, escalation, confidentiality and continuous improvement.

Get A Quote
Call
Call

Get In Touch With Us.

Please fill out the form below to send us an email and we will get back to you as soon as possible.